Revolutionary Design That Protects Children

Revolutionary Design That Protects Children

Safe. Instantly Protects. Durable. Sleek.

The Kangaberry was designed to have a special lining inside (the side facing your body) which shields you from constant radio waves being emitted from the phone (i.e. cell phone), up to and greater than 50dB at frequencies ranging from 10MHz to 3GHz (cell phones operate at 2.4GHz). For children this is very important because their body and nervous systems are still developing and the distance from the handset to the peripheral brain tissues is reduced (i.e. they are much more vulnerable to absorption of electromagnetic radiation) (6). More so, a child’s head being much smaller and their skulls are much thinner.

 

GET NOTIFIED. BE THE FIRST TO GET ONE!

Mobile web adoption has taken the world by storm, and is growing eight times faster than web adoption did in the 1990’s and early 200o’s. In fact, The percent of children with access to some type of “smart” mobile device at home (e.g., smart phone, tablet) has jumped from half (52%) to three-quarters (75%) of all children in just two years! It then won’t surprise you that by the age of eight, 72% of children have used a smart phone, tablet or mobile device.

Mister.Tee

Unfortunately, when cell phone radiation standards were made 17 years ago, infants and toddlers were completely unrepresented in the research (7) and it wasn’t until recently that they were even considered to be consumers. Today, there is a whole market targeted on cellular devices towards children, with more than 700 apps on itunes targeted towards children. Yes, some apps may improve hand-eye coordination, but parents are not at ALL aware of the biological effect wireless radiation-emitting devices can have when held close to the body for long periods of time for a child.

“Using a mobile phone before the age of 20 increases your chance of glioma by 5 fold” – Professor Lennart Kardell, Sweden. It was until recently that children were even customers of wireless technology.

Why Protect Your Child With Kangaberry?

Not only will your child or adolescent not notice the different from their existing cell phone case to the Kangaberry one {our designs are of the highest quality and super cool}, but you will be doing them a favor shielding them from harmful radio waves. Research by some of the top Universities in the world are now confirming the horrific consequences of cell phone radiation on the developing body, and parents need to be aware of the health implications. There have been over 200 published reports by leading institutions around the world regarding cell phone health effects on children – what more evidence does one need?! Some shocking findings include:

  • Radiation Exposure Multiplied In Brain: According to a 471 page report by the World Health Organization,  “the average exposure from use of the same mobile phone is higher by a factor of 2 in a child’s brain and higher by a factor of 10 in the bone marrow of the skull.”
  • Brain Tumours: Another study from Sweden found that the highest risk of brain tumours among people who started using cell phones during adolescents,(1) since their brains absorb more radiation than those of adults.(2,3)
  • Behavioural Problems: A study of 13,159 Danish children showed 80 percent elevated risk for emotional and hyperactivity problems among young children who use cell phones and whose mothers also used cell phones during pregnancy (4)
  • Five Times More Likely To Get Acoustic Neuroma: Professor Lennart Hardell of the University Hospital in Orebro, Sweden found that those who started using mobiles young (before the age of 20), are  five times more likely to get acoustic neuromas, benign but often disabling tumours of the auditory nerve, which usually cause deafness. (5)
  • Radiation Absorption Absorbed Deeper Into Brain: On December 12, 2012, the American Academy of Pediatrics sent a letter to the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) requesting reassessment of cellphone exposure limits:

“Children are disproportionately affected…The differences in bone density and the amount of fluid in a child’s brain compared to an adult’s brain could allow children to absorb greater quantities of RF (radiofrequency) energy deeper into their brains than adults. It is essential that any new standards for cell phones or other wireless devices be based on protecting the youngest and most vulnerable populations to ensure they are safeguarded through their lifetimes.” 

SPECIAL DISCOUNT TO EARLY BACKERS!

References


1) Wang J, Fujiwara O. 2003. Comparison and Evaluation of Electromagnetic Absorption Characteristics in Realistic Human Head Models of Adult and Children for 900-MHz Mobile Telephones. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 51(3): 966-70.
2) Gandhi OP, Lazzi G, Furse CM. 1996. Electromagnetic absorption in the human head and neck for mobile telephones at 835 and 1900 MHz. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 44(10): 1884 – 97.
3) Wang G, Gandhi OP. 2002. SARs for pocket-mounted mobile telephones at 835 and 1900 MHz. Phys Med Biol 47(23): 4301-13
4) Divan HA, Kheifets L, Obel C, Olsen J. 2008. Prenatal and postnatal exposure to cell phone use and behavioral problems in children. Epidemiology 19(4): 523-9.
5)  Hardell L, Carlberg M, Soderqvist F, Milk KH, 2007. Long-term use of cellular phones and brain tumours: increased risk associated with use for 10 years. Occup Envirion Med 64: 626-632 [vi] Wiart J, Hadjem A, Wong MF, Bloch I. 2008. Analysis of RF exposure in the head tissues of children and adults. Phys Med Biol 53(13): 3681-95. Wiedemann PM, Schutz H, Clauberg M. 2008. Influence of information about specific absorption rate (SAR) upon customers’ purchase decisions and safety evaluation of mobile phones. Bioelectromagnetics 29(2): 133-44.
6) Wiart J, Hadjem A, Wong MF, Bloch I. 2008. Analysis of RF exposure in the head tissues of children and adults. Phys Med Biol 53(13): 3681-95. Wiedemann PM, Schutz H, Clauberg M. 2008. Influence of information about specific absorption rate (SAR) upon customers’ purchase decisions and safety evaluation of mobile phones. Bioelectromagnetics 29(2): 133-44.
(7) Gandhi, O, Morgan, L, Augusto de Salles, A, Han, YY, Herberman, R, Davis,DL (2012) Exposure Limits: The underestimation of absorbed cell phone radiation, especially in children,. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine. 31(1): 34-51. http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2012/01/17/cell-phones-using-the-wrong-safety-standards.aspx

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *